3d matrix matrigel Search Results


90
Corning Life Sciences 3d collagen (type i, rat tail)/matrigel matrix
(A) WT (left), Cd37-/- (middle) or CD11c ΔCLEC”2 (right) DCs were stimulated in a <t>3D</t> collagen gel with (bottom row) or without (upper row) recombinant podoplanin-Fc (rPDPN-Fc). Cells were stained for F-actin (red) and nucleus (blue) and imaged with a Leica SP5 confocal fluorescence microscope. One representative cell is shown for each condition (overview with more cells is provided in Supplementary Figure 2). Scale bar = 10μm. (B-D) Number (B) and length (C) of actin protrusions, and morphology index (D) of WT (left), Cd37-/- (middle) or CD11c ΔCLEC ” 2 <t>(right)</t> <t>BMDCs</t> upon rPDPN-Fc stimulation (grey boxes) compared to no ligand (white boxes). Data are shown as Tukey Box & whiskers from 3 independent experiments, total n=3 mice per genotype. In Tukey Box & whiskers, black dots are determined as outliers; i.e. data points outside the 25 th and 75 th percentile, minus or plus the 1.5 interquartile range, respectively. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.
3d Collagen (Type I, Rat Tail)/Matrigel Matrix, supplied by Corning Life Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+matrix+matrigel/bio_rxiv__227918-148-8-17?v=Corning+Life+Sciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d collagen (type i, rat tail)/matrigel matrix - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson 3d matrigel basement membrane matrix
(A) WT (left), Cd37-/- (middle) or CD11c ΔCLEC”2 (right) DCs were stimulated in a <t>3D</t> collagen gel with (bottom row) or without (upper row) recombinant podoplanin-Fc (rPDPN-Fc). Cells were stained for F-actin (red) and nucleus (blue) and imaged with a Leica SP5 confocal fluorescence microscope. One representative cell is shown for each condition (overview with more cells is provided in Supplementary Figure 2). Scale bar = 10μm. (B-D) Number (B) and length (C) of actin protrusions, and morphology index (D) of WT (left), Cd37-/- (middle) or CD11c ΔCLEC ” 2 <t>(right)</t> <t>BMDCs</t> upon rPDPN-Fc stimulation (grey boxes) compared to no ligand (white boxes). Data are shown as Tukey Box & whiskers from 3 independent experiments, total n=3 mice per genotype. In Tukey Box & whiskers, black dots are determined as outliers; i.e. data points outside the 25 th and 75 th percentile, minus or plus the 1.5 interquartile range, respectively. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.
3d Matrigel Basement Membrane Matrix, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+matrix+matrigel/pm39122867-69-12-20?v=Becton+Dickinson
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d matrigel basement membrane matrix - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Corning Life Sciences 96-well phenol red-free corning matrigel matrix-3d plate
(A) WT (left), Cd37-/- (middle) or CD11c ΔCLEC”2 (right) DCs were stimulated in a <t>3D</t> collagen gel with (bottom row) or without (upper row) recombinant podoplanin-Fc (rPDPN-Fc). Cells were stained for F-actin (red) and nucleus (blue) and imaged with a Leica SP5 confocal fluorescence microscope. One representative cell is shown for each condition (overview with more cells is provided in Supplementary Figure 2). Scale bar = 10μm. (B-D) Number (B) and length (C) of actin protrusions, and morphology index (D) of WT (left), Cd37-/- (middle) or CD11c ΔCLEC ” 2 <t>(right)</t> <t>BMDCs</t> upon rPDPN-Fc stimulation (grey boxes) compared to no ligand (white boxes). Data are shown as Tukey Box & whiskers from 3 independent experiments, total n=3 mice per genotype. In Tukey Box & whiskers, black dots are determined as outliers; i.e. data points outside the 25 th and 75 th percentile, minus or plus the 1.5 interquartile range, respectively. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.
96 Well Phenol Red Free Corning Matrigel Matrix 3d Plate, supplied by Corning Life Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+matrix+matrigel/pm38291861-269-11-13?v=Corning+Life+Sciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
96-well phenol red-free corning matrigel matrix-3d plate - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Corning Life Sciences 3d extracellular matrix substitute matrigel
(A) WT (left), Cd37-/- (middle) or CD11c ΔCLEC”2 (right) DCs were stimulated in a <t>3D</t> collagen gel with (bottom row) or without (upper row) recombinant podoplanin-Fc (rPDPN-Fc). Cells were stained for F-actin (red) and nucleus (blue) and imaged with a Leica SP5 confocal fluorescence microscope. One representative cell is shown for each condition (overview with more cells is provided in Supplementary Figure 2). Scale bar = 10μm. (B-D) Number (B) and length (C) of actin protrusions, and morphology index (D) of WT (left), Cd37-/- (middle) or CD11c ΔCLEC ” 2 <t>(right)</t> <t>BMDCs</t> upon rPDPN-Fc stimulation (grey boxes) compared to no ligand (white boxes). Data are shown as Tukey Box & whiskers from 3 independent experiments, total n=3 mice per genotype. In Tukey Box & whiskers, black dots are determined as outliers; i.e. data points outside the 25 th and 75 th percentile, minus or plus the 1.5 interquartile range, respectively. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.
3d Extracellular Matrix Substitute Matrigel, supplied by Corning Life Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+matrix+matrigel/pmc09911751-36-6-11?v=Corning+Life+Sciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d extracellular matrix substitute matrigel - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
3-D Matrix matrigel collagen
Vascular organoids embedded in fibrin gel show a similar differentiation pattern compared to vascular organoids embedded <t>in</t> <t>Matrigel/collagen.</t> Data shown are from Clones 1 and 2. ( a ) Schematic timeline of the differentiation process for both vascular organoid groups. ( b ) Brightfield images of the vascular organoids during the differentiation process (day 13–18). Scale bar depicts 200 μm. ( c ) Gene expression analysis of vascular organoids at different timepoints. Results represented as mean ± SEM, n = 5 for both groups. One-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. No significant differences between the vascular organoid groups were detected except for VE-Cadherin ( p ≤ 0.05). ( d ) Surface area over time (day 13–18). n = 20 vascular organoids for both groups, 4 technical replicates. Results represented as mean ± SEM. Unpaired T-test between timepoints, no significant differences between the vascular organoid groups were detected. ( e ) Vascular organoid composition based on FACS results. Cell content is represented as the percentage of total cells measured. Results represented as mean ± SEM, n = 5 for both groups. Unpaired T-test, no significant differences between the vascular organoid groups were detected. ( f ) Whole-mount staining of vascular organoids. Vascular organoids are stained for endothelial cell marker CD31 (Red) and mural cell marker CD140b (Green). Scale bar depicts 50 μm.
Matrigel Collagen, supplied by 3-D Matrix, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+matrix+matrigel/pmc12528733-1-7-0?v=3-D+Matrix
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matrigel collagen - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Corning Life Sciences matrigel matrix 3d plates corning cat. no. 356256
Vascular organoids embedded in fibrin gel show a similar differentiation pattern compared to vascular organoids embedded <t>in</t> <t>Matrigel/collagen.</t> Data shown are from Clones 1 and 2. ( a ) Schematic timeline of the differentiation process for both vascular organoid groups. ( b ) Brightfield images of the vascular organoids during the differentiation process (day 13–18). Scale bar depicts 200 μm. ( c ) Gene expression analysis of vascular organoids at different timepoints. Results represented as mean ± SEM, n = 5 for both groups. One-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. No significant differences between the vascular organoid groups were detected except for VE-Cadherin ( p ≤ 0.05). ( d ) Surface area over time (day 13–18). n = 20 vascular organoids for both groups, 4 technical replicates. Results represented as mean ± SEM. Unpaired T-test between timepoints, no significant differences between the vascular organoid groups were detected. ( e ) Vascular organoid composition based on FACS results. Cell content is represented as the percentage of total cells measured. Results represented as mean ± SEM, n = 5 for both groups. Unpaired T-test, no significant differences between the vascular organoid groups were detected. ( f ) Whole-mount staining of vascular organoids. Vascular organoids are stained for endothelial cell marker CD31 (Red) and mural cell marker CD140b (Green). Scale bar depicts 50 μm.
Matrigel Matrix 3d Plates Corning Cat. No. 356256, supplied by Corning Life Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+matrix+matrigel/10__1089_slash_gen__40__03__15-14-5-5?v=Corning+Life+Sciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matrigel matrix 3d plates corning cat. no. 356256 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
3-D Matrix 3d matrix matrigel
Vascular organoids embedded in fibrin gel show a similar differentiation pattern compared to vascular organoids embedded <t>in</t> <t>Matrigel/collagen.</t> Data shown are from Clones 1 and 2. ( a ) Schematic timeline of the differentiation process for both vascular organoid groups. ( b ) Brightfield images of the vascular organoids during the differentiation process (day 13–18). Scale bar depicts 200 μm. ( c ) Gene expression analysis of vascular organoids at different timepoints. Results represented as mean ± SEM, n = 5 for both groups. One-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. No significant differences between the vascular organoid groups were detected except for VE-Cadherin ( p ≤ 0.05). ( d ) Surface area over time (day 13–18). n = 20 vascular organoids for both groups, 4 technical replicates. Results represented as mean ± SEM. Unpaired T-test between timepoints, no significant differences between the vascular organoid groups were detected. ( e ) Vascular organoid composition based on FACS results. Cell content is represented as the percentage of total cells measured. Results represented as mean ± SEM, n = 5 for both groups. Unpaired T-test, no significant differences between the vascular organoid groups were detected. ( f ) Whole-mount staining of vascular organoids. Vascular organoids are stained for endothelial cell marker CD31 (Red) and mural cell marker CD140b (Green). Scale bar depicts 50 μm.
3d Matrix Matrigel, supplied by 3-D Matrix, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+matrix+matrigel/pmc13050921-1-14-14?v=3-D+Matrix
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d matrix matrigel - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A) WT (left), Cd37-/- (middle) or CD11c ΔCLEC”2 (right) DCs were stimulated in a 3D collagen gel with (bottom row) or without (upper row) recombinant podoplanin-Fc (rPDPN-Fc). Cells were stained for F-actin (red) and nucleus (blue) and imaged with a Leica SP5 confocal fluorescence microscope. One representative cell is shown for each condition (overview with more cells is provided in Supplementary Figure 2). Scale bar = 10μm. (B-D) Number (B) and length (C) of actin protrusions, and morphology index (D) of WT (left), Cd37-/- (middle) or CD11c ΔCLEC ” 2 (right) BMDCs upon rPDPN-Fc stimulation (grey boxes) compared to no ligand (white boxes). Data are shown as Tukey Box & whiskers from 3 independent experiments, total n=3 mice per genotype. In Tukey Box & whiskers, black dots are determined as outliers; i.e. data points outside the 25 th and 75 th percentile, minus or plus the 1.5 interquartile range, respectively. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: C-type lectin-like receptor 2 (CLEC-2)-dependent DC migration is controlled by tetraspanin CD37

doi: 10.1101/227918

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) WT (left), Cd37-/- (middle) or CD11c ΔCLEC”2 (right) DCs were stimulated in a 3D collagen gel with (bottom row) or without (upper row) recombinant podoplanin-Fc (rPDPN-Fc). Cells were stained for F-actin (red) and nucleus (blue) and imaged with a Leica SP5 confocal fluorescence microscope. One representative cell is shown for each condition (overview with more cells is provided in Supplementary Figure 2). Scale bar = 10μm. (B-D) Number (B) and length (C) of actin protrusions, and morphology index (D) of WT (left), Cd37-/- (middle) or CD11c ΔCLEC ” 2 (right) BMDCs upon rPDPN-Fc stimulation (grey boxes) compared to no ligand (white boxes). Data are shown as Tukey Box & whiskers from 3 independent experiments, total n=3 mice per genotype. In Tukey Box & whiskers, black dots are determined as outliers; i.e. data points outside the 25 th and 75 th percentile, minus or plus the 1.5 interquartile range, respectively. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

Article Snippet: BMDCs (0.3x10 6 ) were seeded into a 3D collagen (type I, rat tail)/matrigel matrix (both from Corning, via Thermo Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK) supplemented with 10% minimum essential medium alpha medium (MEMalpha, Invitrogen, via Thermo Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK) and 10% FCS (Greiner Bio-One, Stonehouse, UK) on glass-bottomed cell culture plates (MatTek Corporation, Bratislava, Slovakia).

Techniques: Recombinant, Staining, Fluorescence, Microscopy

Vascular organoids embedded in fibrin gel show a similar differentiation pattern compared to vascular organoids embedded in Matrigel/collagen. Data shown are from Clones 1 and 2. ( a ) Schematic timeline of the differentiation process for both vascular organoid groups. ( b ) Brightfield images of the vascular organoids during the differentiation process (day 13–18). Scale bar depicts 200 μm. ( c ) Gene expression analysis of vascular organoids at different timepoints. Results represented as mean ± SEM, n = 5 for both groups. One-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. No significant differences between the vascular organoid groups were detected except for VE-Cadherin ( p ≤ 0.05). ( d ) Surface area over time (day 13–18). n = 20 vascular organoids for both groups, 4 technical replicates. Results represented as mean ± SEM. Unpaired T-test between timepoints, no significant differences between the vascular organoid groups were detected. ( e ) Vascular organoid composition based on FACS results. Cell content is represented as the percentage of total cells measured. Results represented as mean ± SEM, n = 5 for both groups. Unpaired T-test, no significant differences between the vascular organoid groups were detected. ( f ) Whole-mount staining of vascular organoids. Vascular organoids are stained for endothelial cell marker CD31 (Red) and mural cell marker CD140b (Green). Scale bar depicts 50 μm.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Animal-free alternatives for Matrigel in human iPSC-derived blood vessel organoid culture

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-20091-w

Figure Lengend Snippet: Vascular organoids embedded in fibrin gel show a similar differentiation pattern compared to vascular organoids embedded in Matrigel/collagen. Data shown are from Clones 1 and 2. ( a ) Schematic timeline of the differentiation process for both vascular organoid groups. ( b ) Brightfield images of the vascular organoids during the differentiation process (day 13–18). Scale bar depicts 200 μm. ( c ) Gene expression analysis of vascular organoids at different timepoints. Results represented as mean ± SEM, n = 5 for both groups. One-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. No significant differences between the vascular organoid groups were detected except for VE-Cadherin ( p ≤ 0.05). ( d ) Surface area over time (day 13–18). n = 20 vascular organoids for both groups, 4 technical replicates. Results represented as mean ± SEM. Unpaired T-test between timepoints, no significant differences between the vascular organoid groups were detected. ( e ) Vascular organoid composition based on FACS results. Cell content is represented as the percentage of total cells measured. Results represented as mean ± SEM, n = 5 for both groups. Unpaired T-test, no significant differences between the vascular organoid groups were detected. ( f ) Whole-mount staining of vascular organoids. Vascular organoids are stained for endothelial cell marker CD31 (Red) and mural cell marker CD140b (Green). Scale bar depicts 50 μm.

Article Snippet: 3D Matrix , Matrigel + collagen , Matrigel + collagen , Fibrinogen + thrombin.

Techniques: Clone Assay, Gene Expression, Staining, Marker